Canon B001CBMD6A Compare, Reviews, Discounts
 |
Canon B001CBMD6A Compare, Reviews, Discounts.
Product: Canon B001CBMD6A Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon B001CBMD6A
* December 7, 2008 *
When I originally wrote this review succor in August 2008, the tag of the XSi and the XS kits were the same. Encourage then, you would have been foolish to choose the XS kit when the XSi offered a lot more at the same ticket. During the second-half of 2008, the designate of the XS kit has dropped significantly. Due to the distinguished stamp dissimilarity between the Canon XSi kit and the Canon XS kit, I have revised this article.
The Canon EOS Rebel XS is the "small brother" of the Canon EOS Rebel XSi which means they are both almost the same camera, but the XSi has more to offer than the XS. Perhaps reflect basing your buying decision on how serious you will be taking up digital SLR photography. If you firmly have that you will win digital SLR photography very seriously in the long accelerate and want a solid entry-level digital SLR camera, then the Canon XSi may be a better choice for you. If effect is your main misfortune and you are only looking for Canon's bottom entry-level digital SLR model, then the original imprint of the Canon XS kit is quite superb of a select consideration.
Both models were released in 2008, with the Canon XSi released in April and the Canon XS released four months later in August. By comparison, the XS is a trimmed-down version of the XSi.
Here are the valuable similarities of the XSi and the XS:
* Both have practically the same enormous single-plate CMOS sensor and the Digic III Image Processor, except the XSi is 12.2MP while the XS is only 10.1MP (megapixels) .
* Both have the Canon EOS Integrated Cleaning System.
* Both can be purchased with the same EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Kit Lens. It is possible to prefer the XSi camera body without the kit lens.
* Both have Live Opinion Function with their LCD displays.
* Both are fully compatible with Canon EF and EF-S lenses.
* Both use SD and SDHC memory cards.
* Both utilize the same battery pack (LP-E5) and the same optional battery grip (BG-E5) .
* The XS is compatible with most of the Canon EOS camera system accessories that can be weak with the XSi.
Now here are the differences between the XS and the XSi:
* The XSi has more megapixels at 12.2MP while the XS is 10.1MP.
* For JPEG, the XSi can continuously shoot at 3.5 fps while the XS can do 3.0 fps. But for RAW, the XSi is noteworthy better at 3.5 fps while the XS can only do 1.5 fps.
* The LCD monitor of the XSi measures 3.0 inches while the XS has a smaller mask at 2.5 inches.
* The XSi has a 9-point AF system while the XS has only a 7-point.
* The XSi has Residence metering while the XS does not. Both have Evaluative, Partial, and Center-weighted metering, however.
* The XSi RAW is 14-bit while the XS RAW is 12-bit.
* XSi has Highlight Tone Priority while XS does not.
* The viewfinder of the XSi provides 0.87x magnification while the XS provides 0.81x.
* The XSi can use the RC-1 or the RC-5 wireless remote shutter release, but the XS is not compatible with either so you won't be able to employ a wireless remote release.
* You cannot rob the XS without the kit lens.
My point of this review is to attend consumers weigh their decision between the XSi and the XS from a pricing perspective. As of this writing, I feel that the XSi is currently the best Canon entry-level digital SLR camera for serious beginning enthusiasts. In my conception, the XS is best for those primarily concerned with the sign. If you contemplate you will not need definite features that the XSi has but the XS does not, then buying the XS will achieve you money. Not everyone will spend all of the features on the XSi. However, the XSi may provide serious enthusiasts with more room for growth compared to the XS.
NOTE: Canon USA officially released the EOS Rebel XS in August 2008 and was first announced by Canon USA on July 8, 2008.
"Date first available at Amazon.com: June 17, 2003" is truly an error.
I spent several weeks reviewing the REBEL XS vs it's many 10 MP adversaries, I even checked it against the ultra zooms as I wanted the convenience of video as well, but too many agreeable things stood out with this camera and so I decided upon it. I bought the rebel XS and after days of dirt testing this camera I've found it a splendid experience.
Now I'm a professional videographer attached to a tv space in Trinidad & Tobago, my purpose for this camera was the need for a swiftly spirited mild shot camera that would be impressive under vulgar light and mild remove impressive portrait shots to be veteran for my website and for grand prints. I didn't want to shell out over a $1000. US for a camera body.
What is tagged by Canon is true: The fleshy auto mode is truly proper and gives reliable shots always, it makes photography so easy for a beginner or intermediate. The portrait mode isn't blurry, images are tidy, nicely toned, grand in quality for stout size prints. The P ( program mode) I like alot at first because this mode sets exposure so nicely I found it addictive. I shot alot of night pics of cars on a freeway, with intellectual, enchanting, interesting colours emerging. Night pics at 800 iso had very very very limited noise, and I mean I was searching the pics on 15" monitors for reason to complain, but was really impressed.
The auto focus is really speedily. Th XS comes with "only" a 7 point auto focus system compared to the XSi 9 point, forgive me when I say there may be no need for another 2 points when the camera focusses so rapid and so accurately. I have not gotten a soft image when shot with the auto focus operating.
Now for those point and shoot cams that boast about "face detection"....5 faces...6,7, some even 15. I also have a 10 mp ultra zoom, this simply matters tiny if not at all, if the focussing ability of the camera is terrible or average, and given the "average lens" quality they're made of.
I have learnt clearly that a 10 MP ultra zoom simply cannot compare to a 10 MP D SLR...chalk and cheese.
I also bought the Tamron 70mm - 300mm, F4-5.6 telephoto/ macro lens. No vignetting at either ruin of the lens.
Auto iso is simply graceful, have not taken a shot where the camera over estimated or underestimated the iso levels.
The Manual mode of this camera is the most impressive for me. The rebel XS via various magazine testing has advance up faster than it's other 10 MP rivals when it comes to fps shooting, and burst images. It really does shoot 3 fps consistently, it shoots 2.3 fps in uncouth light, worst case is over 1 fps all at 10 MP quality.
I haven't musty a lower quality since, given I bought a Transcend 8GB SDHC card storage is not an relate.
Most of my shooting has been at night, for the microscopic done in daylight, it has been unbelievable. Colours are very luminous, depth of field very very nice. Macros works well. Image optimizer simply timid life out of me. I was in a unlit place and without flash it really improves the subject without over blowing the background, stuff that is almost impossible on point and shoot cams.
Stuff I disagree with from the "reviews" : 1- "The camera feels cheaply built"....simply infamous, nothing is shabby, buttons are actually easy to press, doesn't have cheap clicks to them, the lens mount has a net feel to it, and a obedient snap when it is location. Battery compartment is certainly accumulate. Your finger must intricately begin the door for entry, won't be an accident tell. Rubber door at a.v. ports snap in well. Rubber grip is firm enough, still enough to not irritate your hands.
2- " XS is "overpriced" compared to the XSi.....Xsi shoots slower than the XS, XSi report quality is equal to the XS even though the XSi is 12 MP. The XSi may be the 3" LCD and a few other upgrades, but these upgrades don't add up when the portray is taken and the quality of both cameras match alike. I may have chosen the XSI if I wanted to use the extra $150. u.s but for the lesser sign, I'm yet to regret.
3- "The XS "only has a 2.5" LCD compared to a couple of it's rivals having 3" LCD's". I can sight every thing clearly with this cover, even with Histograms, and grids onscreen. If LCD's catch worthy bigger then canon may need to install a tv tuner as well....the 2.5" is more than sufficient.
4- "The XS doesn't have Space METERING compared to the XSi, so this is a tremendous explain"- haven't encountered a reason to complain yet, after 500 night shots and 200 day shots.
THE DOWN SIDE: the EOS software for uploading the photos to computer, and remote controlling the cam via computer is Unpleasant. It's a task to upload, as it is beach balling when you hit "upload". Digital professional software is non responsive. I have not been able to exercise the software past the install point. Mac version here.
Better exercise i-photo and photoshop.
I highly rate this camera, and as a videographer who's accustomed to t.v. broadcast quality the REBEL XS is worth it, and since canon is so intent on pushing the rebel XSi they have significantly lowered the notice on the XS.....I recommend people catch the XS and accept a kindly lens with the discount earned. The trick is in the lens and the user, and lesser the camera.
I want to do you the time and uncertainty in choosing the best affordable DSLR. For those considering the Canon EOS Rebel XS, the Olympus E-510 or the Nikon D40 / D40x / D60, I contain the Canon XS is the best choice. Also, at the effect dissimilarity between the XS and the SXi ($150-200 as of December '08), the XS is an qualified alternative--both rob exactly the same high quality pictures, establish the 2MP disagreement, which is negligible at the extinguish. Please sign that the XS's recent lens kit comes with the better quality EFS 18-55 Image Stabilization lens (they are better engineered) ; and that Canon is offering nowadays agreeable rebates on telephoto lenses when coupled with the consume of the XS (I bought mine with the entry-level Canon EF 75-300mm III lens with a top-notch instant Canon rebate. Don't steal from anybody different from B&H Photo, directly from Amazon, Adorama, Buydig/Beach Camera; pause away from Broadway Photo and TriState) .
Canons are current for the suitable image processing. Nikons for their Nikor lenses. Olympus, some say, for the color of some of the pictures they catch.
The Olympus E-510 has well-known flaws, e.g., the average performance in high ISO speeds and highlight blowing. Also, its inconsistency with wonderful results is worth noting.
The Nikon D40 lacks necessary features, e.g., image stabilization in their kit lens. The D60 is lacking the high relate quality ratings of the Canon XS. Both Nikons are nice looking, which is a selling factor I usually consider; but recount quality should be your top criterion for the long bustle.
Don't go through the extensive research I have already done (months, and intense debating) . The Canon XS is a winner (specially with the modern IS lens kit), even more with its modern brand (Dec. '08: $480) . It is feature rich (you can even add 3 of your preferred defined Narrate Style modes), good/professional looking (dusky body), even the sound of the shooter is nicer than the others. Bottom line: Apt record quality, high ISO/low light grand performance, and relevant features and residence for customization build the Canon XS a winner for months and even years to approach.
